AVERT-IT

Entries categorized as ‘Exploitation’

Project Progress Report – Month 18

October 10, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Objectives

The primary objective of our research is providing clinicians with advanced notice of upcoming hypotensive episodes.

In order to achieve this result we’re needing to solve a number of issues:

* Agree a common definition of hypotensive episode – all six of our centres currently work to different definitions
* Build a software interface which collects data from patient monitoring devices – all centres have different equipment
* Find a way of transmitting patient data from the research centres to our data warehouse
* Build software which collects observation, treatment and outcome data at the bedside
* Build a Bayesian Artificial Neural Network and train it to recognise patterns which precede hypotensive episodes
* Build software to enable researchers to analyse actual data, identifying circumstances in which the BANN achieves an accurate prediction and those in which if provides false positives
* Build software which alerts clinicians to potential upcoming episodes.
* Multi stage clinical trial.

In parallel the project includes the need for multi stage ethics approval, support from IT staff in each of the centres, identification and protection of foreground IPR, and multiple routes to market.

We’re also required to promote Framework 7 research and collaborate with other FP7 projects as appropriate.

Results

The starting point for our research has been a database of patient care data amassed as part of the Brain IT project, previously funded under Frameworks 4 and 5. This data is minute by minute readings from monitors, and comprises more than 200 patients with traumatic brain injuries. In some cases the data is incomplete and possibly inaccurate.

In the first stage we analysed the legacy data testing the various definitions of hypotension used by the research centres. Comparison of the definitions and events indicated by them enabled us to agree between all six centres a common definition, on which we could train the BANN.

In the second stage the BANN was used to examine patterns of parameters preceding episodes. Subsequent monitoring of those patterns suggested approximately 35% of future episodes could be identified as outputs from the pattern recognition. In addition some false positive predictions indicated ways the monitored parameters and definitions could be refined to improve accuracy.

In the third stage, working with IT staff at the centres data capture and transmission software has been built and installed. Software for collecting data at the bedside has been built in conjunction with clinical staff and installed. Software enabling researchers to monitor and enhance the accuracy of the prediction engine has been installed and is now in production use.

in the fourth stage we’ll be monitoring and enhancing the BANN prediction capabilities, preparing data which will support our application for ethics approval for stage five – live monitoring and alerting of upcoming episodes.

Throughout the project we’ve been researching questions related to the protection of IPR in the worlds major markets. As of yet we’ve made no application for patent – because we haven’t finished the research. We’re still refining our understanding of monitored parameters and which patterns offer which levels of accurate prediction.

We’ve also collaborated with multiple public bodies, promoting FP7 and offering guidance to potential applicants.

The Avert-IT project has been selected by the Use and Diffuse project as an example of best practice and features in the projects publications.

Categories: Dissemination · Exploitation

Avert-IT Selected for Best Practice by Use and Diffuse

January 21, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Just Announced – Avert-IT has been recognised for “Best Practice” and will be included in publications advising on exploitation and dissemination of research results

USEandDIFFUSE is co-financed by the European Commission DG Research under the 7-th Framework Programme.

The Strategic Objective of the USEandDIFFUSE project is to enhance the dissemination and exploitation of research results and facilitate the exchange of best practices in this area.

To this end, this project will focus for the most part on RTD projects implemented under the Framework Programmes with the involvement of small and medium sized enterprises (CRAFT projects, Collective Research projects, as well as STREPs and Integrated Projects in which SMEs play active roles as RTD performers and end users of results) and will aim to identify leading projects in terms of results exploitation and dissemination. In addition, best practice will be extracted and will provide a solid platform upon which ongoing and future projects can build in order to contribute to a European Research Area that has a true impact on the competitiveness of SMEs, the pillar of our European economy.

The full list of projects included in the best practice group is available here

Categories: Exploitation · Uncategorized

How Big a Problem is Traumatic Brain Injury?

November 20, 2008 · Leave a Comment

A recent visit to the Brain Injury Association revealed very clear explanation of TBI and just how big a problem it is.

Prevention

Every 15 Seconds…

Every 15 seconds, someone in the US sustains a brain injury. In Kentucky one in 5 families report they have at least one family member with a brain injury. The only cure for brain injury is prevention.

In the US, the leading causes of brain injury are:

  • Falls (28%)
  • Motor vehicle traffic crashes (20%)
  • Struck by/against (19%) and
  • Assault (11%)

Blasts are a leading cause of TBI for active duty military personnel in war zones

In Kentucky, the leading causes of brain injury are motor vehicle traffic crashes. Teens between 15 and 24 are the most at risk.

Water Safety

Summer time is here and we all need to be concerned about water safety. Drowning deaths in Kentucky average about 53 a year. These are preventable deaths. Most occur in children under age 4.

Categories: Exploitation · Uncategorized

IPR Protection

November 3, 2008 · Leave a Comment

We have a challenge regarding what the EU in Framework 7 describes as Dissemination and Exploitation.

To be fair FP7 is targeted at all types of innovation and in most cases the protection of foreground results is the standard patent application process. Life gets a little more difficult in medical projects and especially when it comes to software.

First off people say it’s really hard to patent software with the need to prove the innovation.

Second they tell us it’s not possible to patent anything to do with diagnostics.

Third they tell us we can’t patent anything that’s in the public domain (fair enough).

Fourth the EU wants us to “disseminate” the results in conferences etc.

Fifth the medical community won’t accept our technology unless we tell the world exactly how it works.

Sixth, best of all the venture capital community won’t invest in our technology unless we have a patent.

Confused? I am :-)

Categories: Exploitation · Uncategorized